Digital Radiography - Placement for the Anterior Mandible
THE NEXT DDS
The use of digital images and radiographs has continued to improve treatment options and expand the clinical armamentarium. Radiography sensors have subsequently been developed to translate the radiographic energy into digital images that are viewable on any compatible monitor. The designs of these sensors have been modified to facilitate patient comfort, and these devices are often available in a variety of shapes, sizes, and thicknesses. Operation concerns are addressed by varied wire placement and software and image manipulation options. The diagnostic quality of the radiographic image capture, combined with increased patient comfort, allows practitioners to provide enhanced, affordable, and quality care for continued patient satisfaction.
As a result of watching this video, the viewer should:
- Understand the advantages of utilizing digital radiography over traditional radiography.
- Be able to visualize the process of performing digital radiography in the anterior mandible region.
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Radiation Protection in Dentistry Report No. 145. Washington, DC: NCRP; 2003. Revised 2004.
- Falk A, Lindhe J, Rohlin M, and Nilsson M. Effects of collimator size of a dental X-ray unit on image contrast. Dentomaxillofac Radiol1999;28(5):261-266.
- Bahrami G, Hagstrøm C, Wenzel A. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32(5):317-321.
- Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27(2):97-101.
- BerkhoutWE. Sanderink GC. Van der Stelt PF. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices.Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32(2):124-127.
- Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85(1):113-118.
- Bragger U, Burgin W, Marconi M, et al. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI). J Periodontal Res 1994;29(2):95-102.
- Shi XQ, Li G, Yoshiura K, Welander U. Perceptibility curve test for conventional and colour-coded radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(5):318-322.
- Castro VM. Katz JO. Hardman PK. Glaros AG. Spencer P. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36(3):138-142.
- Haak R, Wicht MJ. Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries. J Dent 2005;33(1):65-71.
- Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL. Students’ attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment. European Journal of Dental Education 2004;8(4):95-102.
- Woolhiser GA, Brand JW, Hoen MM, Geist JR, et al. Accuracy of film-based, digital and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99(4):499-504.