* denotes required field

Your Name: *

FIRST NAME

 LAST NAME

Gender: *

Personal Email: *

This will be your username

Password: *

Display Name: *

This will be what others see in social areas of the site.

Address: *

STREET ADDRESS (LINE 1) *

 

STREET ADDRESS (LINE 2)

 

CITY *

STATE *

ZIP *

 

 

Phone Number:

School/University: *

Graduation Date: *

Date of Birth: *

ASDA Membership No:



ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

Username

 

Password

Hi returning User! please login with Facebook credentials where Facebook Username is same as THENEXTDDS Username.

Username

 

Password

 
Article
Comments (0)

Intraoral Radiography

Seven rules for the successful use of IOR with implant-based restorations  

Radiography plays an integral role in the planning, surgical and restorative phases of dental implant therapy. It has also been used to follow the “health” and measure long-term success of these medical devices.

A well-made radiographic image (film or sensor) can give lots of information about what is occurring, but as with any diagnostic tool, it is not without limitations. These should be clearly understood by the clinician so that information received can be properly acted upon.

 

Rule number 1

Osseointegration can only be confirmed with light microscopy sections,and cannot be confirmed by radiographs alone.

Radiography simply gives an indication of bone-to-implant contact, which for most offices is restricted to 2-dimensional imaging even though the site is 3-dimensional.

As a guide, it should be understood that limitations exist when reviewing bone-to-implant contact on a radiograph. Studies report that uniform gaps of up to 100 microns between the implant and surrounding bone sometimes go undetected, even when experienced clinicians are reviewing the images.

 

Rule number 2

Radiographic site information prior to restoration is extremely useful.

The implant and the adjacent sites can be evaluated for any pathosis, implant positioning, angulation and the best path of restoration insertion. Radiographs can reveal bone quality and quantity and various bone patters can be highlighted by IOR images.

This is important as implants are commonly placed in alveolar bone, which may have large marrow spaces that could impact the way we restore the implant. This is well understood in other areas of dentistry (e.g., endodontics). Marrow spaces provide an easy escape route for cement, which can sometimes be observed around implants when cementing a crown.

 

Rule number 3

X-ray angulation is everything.

When confirming how components fit, IOR can be indispensable, especially for sites that cannot be directly visualized or accessed with explorers. With the implant more than 20 degrees off the incident X-ray beam, the mismatch of components becomes almost impossible to detect. When the angulation error is closer to 5 degrees or less, the components can be confirmed to fit to within 50 microns or less. As a general rule, when reviewing radiographic images, the clearer the screw thread pattern seen, the closer the incident X-ray beam is to perpendicular to the implant body.

 

Rule number 4

Serial radiographs intended to monitor marginal bone levels must be standardized.

Standardized positioning requires establishing a consistent method of holding the radiographic sensor (or film) and the incident beam at 90 degrees to the implant’s long axis, each and every time the image is produced. Remember, when a 2-dimensional image is made of a 3-dimensional site, angulation grossly affects what is identified in the image due to beam projection.

Interestingly, most studies on bone loss around implants fail to achieve standard, reproducible images, making comparisons between serial images just about meaningless. Note that sites adjacent to the implant offer clues to angulation errors. Radiopaque crown margins that change shape on nearby teeth are frequently a giveaway of angle shift.

 

Rule number 5

Understand your implant system and how the mechanical union of the parts you are working with appear on a radiograph.

Because certain system components have flat matching surfaces, errors in attachments can be easily detected when the radiographs have been taken 90 degrees to the incident X-ray beam. Non-flat, internal tapered systems may appear very different to their flat-top counterparts. By assessing the screw dimensions carefully, the clinician will readily understand if the components match well and are seated correctly.

 

Rule number 6

When making a cement-retained implant restoration with inaccessible margins, use IOR to locate possible residual excess cement that may cause future problems.

Use a cement that can be clearly identified on a radiographic film. Many cements show up poorly, thus remaining undetected, which could impact the future health of the tissues supporting the implant. As a general rule, choose a cement with minimum radiopacity equivalent to 3mm of aluminum (which is the same minimum required by the ADA for endodontic sealer cements).

 

Rule number 7

Use radiographic imaging as one of several diagnostic tools.

A variety of clinical criteria need to be taken into account before treatment decisions are made. For example, probing-depths correlate very well with radiographic bone changes, especially within the first few years following implant placement. Using more than one test to determine what, if any, therapy is required is always a good idea. Remember no test is perfect or absolute! And do remember: All radiographic procedures require that the most appropriate and best practices be used to minimize patient exposure to radiation.

 

Related Reading:

  1. http://thenextdds.com/Articles/A-Brief-Overview-on-Digital-Radiography-Systems/
  2. http://thenextdds.com/clinicalimages.aspx?catid=612&id=4294972289
  3. http://thenextdds.com/Articles/Digital-Radiography-in-Endodontic-Therapy/
  4. http://thenextdds.com/Videos/Digital-Radiography---Placement-for-the-Anterior-Mandible/
  5. Wadhwani C, Schuler R, et al. Intraoral radiography and Dental Implant Restoration. Dentistry Today. Dent Today CE 2012.  
  6. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Rad Endodont 2000;5:630-637.  
Sorry, your current access level does not permit you to view this page.