* denotes required field

Your Name: *

FIRST NAME

 LAST NAME

Gender: *

Personal Email: *

This will be your username

Password: *

Display Name: *

This will be what others see in social areas of the site.

Address: *

STREET ADDRESS (LINE 1) *

 

STREET ADDRESS (LINE 2)

 

CITY *

STATE *

ZIP *

 

 

Phone Number:

School/University: *

Graduation Date: *

Date of Birth: *

ASDA Membership No:



ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

Username

 

Password

Hi returning User! please login with Facebook credentials where Facebook Username is same as THENEXTDDS Username.

Username

 

Password

 
Article
Comments (0)

An Innovative Chairside Bleaching Protocol for Treating Stained Dentition

Initial Results

In the 1970s, chemical bleaching techniques that utilized heat- and light-activated hydrogen peroxide were reintroduced for the treatment of tooth discoloration caused by new tetracycline antibiotics,1 which has since become a recurring clinical concern.2-4 Researchers first described the catastrophic effects of tetracycline on tooth color in the 1960s. The treatment of these patients with bleaching methods has been described in various publications.5,6

Numerous investigations have been conducted to improve this chemical treatment and clearly define the clinical procedures and their field of application.7,8 These studies were often predicated on the use of 35% hydrogen peroxide, activated by a halogen lamp.9 Nevertheless, other studies that use highly concentrated (70%) solutions have been identified (eg, Zaragoza Bleaching Method),10,11 where the use of hydrogen peroxide is activated only by heat (Figure 1). These techniques have been evaluated since the beginning of the 1980s, and many remain popular methods for treating stained dentition.12

Despite the use of highly concentrated bleaching solutions, preliminary treatments, powerful lamps, and dangerously high temperatures, the results of tooth-whitening procedures remain limited. Recent developments in chairside bleaching agents, which advocate the use of highly concentrated gels, chemical accelerators, plasma/laser high-energy lamps, and light-cured gingival barriers, have subsequently simplified these treatments. Although the results achieved with these methods have demonstrated a slight improvement, they are not significantly different from those currently obtained with at-home bleaching techniques, and further amelioration is necessary.

In 1989, the use of a 10% carbamide peroxide gel (equivalent to 3.6% of H202) was proposed.13,14 The bleaching gel was applied via a plastic tray and worn for one to eight hours each day for two to six weeks.15,16 This technique proved to be a simple, rapid, inexpensive, and efficient modality that presented minimal risk to the existing tooth structure.17

At-home bleaching currently has well-defined indications and limitations,18 and is efficacious primarily for nonpathological staining (eg, unvarying yellow and orange discolorations). In instances where pathological staining (eg, gray band) is present, a prolonged chairside treatment or the use of a more concentrated gel is required, although the desired results may not be achieved.19 Due to the caustic nature of tooth-whitening agents with higher chemical concentration, many bleaching formulations must be administered chairside to prevent tissue damage.20,21 In order to activate these agents and to obtain their decomposition reaction, a halogen, plasma, or even laser light-source is required.

The decomposition reaction of some bleaching formulations can be initiated with a light source or a chemical accelerator, which results in the formation of oxidizing ions (Figure 2). Two reactions have become generally accepted:

Photo dissociation

(light, temperature)

2H2O2 ----- 2H2O + O2

Anionic dissociation

(Basic Ph + activator [perborate or persulfate])

temperature

H2O2 ----- HO2- + H+

The carbamide peroxide decomposition reaction also results in the formation of oxidizing ions.

10% carbamide peroxide ----- 6.4% urea + 3.6% H2O2

-----water and oxygen ions

Once initiation has occurred, either photo dissociation or anionic dissociation may occur. According to other researchers,19 a third reaction may occur in which a combination of the first and second reactions result in the formation of more reactive oxygen ions and HO2 free radicals. The carbamide peroxide decomposition reaction also results in the formation of oxidizing ions.

 

Selection of an Optimal Bleaching Modality

For years, clinicians have been unable to explain why the use of low levels of hydrogen peroxide (2% to 4%) in at-home bleaching techniques is more effective than higher concentrations (30% to 50%) utilized in a chairside procedure. Why has no dental researcher, author, or manufacturer provided a logical explanation for this clinical experience, which is well-known among clinicians? While the duration of application is often cited as a paramount factor, this is not the sole explanation for this circumstance.

 

At-Home Bleaching

As carbamide peroxide is activated within a bleaching tray, slight pressure is created by the release of the bleaching agent (Figure 3). The gradual decomposition of the carbamide gels allows this pressure to be maintained for several hours, during which time oxygen ions are able to permeate the enamel due to their light molecular weight. The high viscosity of the carbamide peroxide gels and the seal of the bleaching tray maintain this pressure, which is essential for the permeation of the oxidizing molecules. In order to enhance the seal of an at-home bleaching tray, it should be trimmed horizontally 2 mm to 3 mm from the neck of the teeth.

 

Chairside Bleaching

Following the placement of a gingival barrier, a hydrogen peroxide gel or liquid is applied to the discolored teeth and activated with heat, light, or a chemical agent (eg, sodium perborate).9,21 Once the decomposition reaction is initiated, small bubbles appear in the gel that indicate the release of the oxygen ion. Unlike the at-home bleaching technique, these ions migrate and only a small proportion of them will permeate the enamel (Figure 4). In order to enable the permeation of oxidizing ions through the enamel, the nascent oxygen must be guided under pressure. For an understanding of this phenomenon, it is necessary to review the action mechanism of treatments used for discolored nonvital teeth.

For more than a decade,22 clinicians have used a blending mixture of sodium perborate and distilled water, which yields fewer oxygen ions than does hydrogen or carbamide peroxide.23 Despite a low release of oxygen ions, this technique is very efficient and presents minimal risk.18,24 This has been attributed to the provision of a perfect seal on two sides of the pulp chamber (Figure 5). The increase in pressure confined to a perfectly sealed small cavity facilitates the permeation of the oxygen ions from the pulp chamber into the dentin and enamel.25

This action mechanism is considered to be a conventional method,22 and it has been noted that if the zinc-eugenol provisional cement does not yield a perfect seal, the sodium perborate will have little or no effect. As a result, the clinicians found it necessary to place the bleaching agent under pressure during its decomposition in an effort to force the oxidizing ions to permeate through the dentin enamel. Following a myriad of trials involving a modified home bleaching tray,26 a protocol termed "the compressive bleaching technique" has been developed.

(Continued from page 1 )

Case Presentations

 

Case 1

A 25-year-old female patient presented with pathologically discolored teeth caused by the administration of tetracycline during infancy (Figure 6). During anamnesis it was determined that previous attempts at whitening had yielded unsatisfactory results. Although the placement of ceramic laminate veneers was proposed, the patient declined this suggestion and elected to first undergo a bleaching protocol using chemical means; the results of the whitening would determine if prosthodontics were necessary.

A combined technique was selected for this patient utilizing a conventional home bleaching technique that contained a 10% carbamide peroxide gel, as well as a highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide gel (35%) that was applied chairside with the compressive technique. During the initial appointment, the initial color of the patient's teeth was assessed (shade C3) using a shade guide (Figure 7). In order to fabricate two sets of trays - one for the home bleaching modality and the other for the compressive procedure - the teeth were carefully scaled, and two impressions were made.

To facilitate the home bleaching technique, reservoirs were created using a light-cured resin; these reservoirs covered the facial aspect of the teeth and were placed in close proximity to the gingival margins and incisal edges. In order to prevent the tray from irritating the interproximal spaces, they were protected with the light-cured resin (Figure 8). The tray was trimmed at a distance of 2 mm to 3 mm from the gingival margins without scalloped margins, in order to simplify the trimming and to enhance the fit of the tray on the edges (Figure 9).

The trays used in the compressive technique were also trimmed without scalloped margins and are 2 mm to 3 mm shorter; their edges extend to the gingival margins of the teeth. Their reservoirs are larger and cover all the facial aspects of the teeth including the incisal edges, and are 2 mm from the gingival margin (Figure 10). In addition, the interproximal spaces are protected to avoid a malposition of the tray following placement of gingival protection. Since it is difficult to protect the gingival region and close the trays beyond the premolars, the trays should not be extended beyond the first premolar or first molar.

 

Chairside Protocol

In order to remove any soft deposit, the teeth were first cleaned with an air polisher. The use of an automatic retractor was indispensable for completing this procedure. The trays were then tried in and adjusted. Gingival protection facilitated for the maxilla and mandible with a light-cured resin barrier (Figure 11). Once the teeth were recleansed and rinsed, the tray was reseated (Figure 12), the reservoirs were filled with 35% hydrogen peroxide gel, and any excess was removed. Each tray was sealed along the facial and lingual edges with light-cured resin material to prevent any leakage during gel decomposition (Figure 13). Once the facial and lingual edges of the tray were sealed (Figures 14 and 15), the gel was activated with a halogen or plasma lamp (Figure 16). Each of the four chairside appointments was approximately 30 minutes in duration (Figure 17). Between these visits, the patient was instructed to apply the 10% hydrogen peroxide gel nightly with the home bleaching trays for 20 consecutive days.

During the course of treatment, the patient experienced slight sensitivities to heat and cold. Although all the discolorations did not disappear entirely, the shade of the teeth changed from shade C3 to shade A0 (Figure 18). The patient was pleased with the aesthetic result of the whitening procedure, and the prosthetic treatment was unnecessary. It is important to note that a fluoride treatment should be advised for several days in order to facilitate surface remineralization while reducing hot and cold sensitivities.27 The fluoride regimen, in this instance, required the patient to wear trays filled with fluoride gel for two to three hours each day.

 

Case 2

A 30-year-old female patient presented with nonpathological yellow and orange discolorations and requested whitening treatment (Figure 19). Following anamnesis and complete clinical examination, a tooth-whitening treatment was planned for the patient. Since she declined to wear trays at night, chairside treatment using the compression technique was administered.

Prior to treatment, the initial shade of the teeth was recorded and determined to be A3.5. Trays were fabricated in accordance with the aforementioned protocol, and the compressive technique was utilized. The goal to reach shade A1 following three or four 30-minute treatments was accomplished (Figures 20-21-22), as this specific bleaching technique was effective on this type of discoloration. The patient was pleased with the aesthetic enhancement achieved through the use of this technique.

 

Current Clinical Investigations

The author's initial clinical results were determined through treatment of more than 40 patients in the first year. Thus far, the clinical results appear to be promising, and these cases will be continuously monitored to determine the long-term success of the compressive technique. Two additional investigations are currently in progress that should soon provide scientific documentation of the technique's efficacy. The first is a comparative study realized by three clinicians; the second is an in vitro study to examine the volume and speed of the permeation of the oxygen ions through the enamel with and without compression. The results of these investigations will be presented as these data become available.

 

Conclusion

The basic principle of chemical bleaching is characterized by the permeation of oxygen ions through the enamel and the dentin of discolored teeth. In order to obtain an effective permeation under the best conditions, it is necessary to use the compressive technique with either the at-home or chairside modality. The compressive bleaching technique described in this article has been clinically tested repeatedly and is now clearly defined. It can be used with several high concentration gels, as they can be quickly decomposed using light or a chemical agent. Although the compressive bleaching technique makes it possible to obtain better results than the conventional technique, it cannot claim to treat all kinds of dental discolorations. Further progress is necessary to enhance the permeation and efficiency of current products.

 

References:

  1. Martin NO, Barnard PD. The prevalence of tetracycline staining in erupted teeth. Med J Aust 1969;1:1286-1289.
  2. Abbot C. Bleaching discolored teeth by means of 30% Perhydrol and electric light rays. J Allied Dent Soc 1918;13:259.
  3. Atkinson D. Tetracycline and its effect on teeth. Dent Assist 1978;47(6):36-40.
  4. Nathoo SA. The chemistry and mechanisms of extrinsic and intrinsic discoloration. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128(suppl):6S-10S.
  5. Cohen S, Parkins FM. Bleaching tetracycline stained vital teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970;29(3):465-471.
  6. Arens DE, Rich JJ, Healey HJ. A practical method of bleaching tetracycline-stained teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34(5):812-817.
  7. Feinman RA, Goldstein RE, Garber DA. Bleaching Teeth. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 1989:84-96.
  8. Hattab FN, Qudeimat MA, al Rimawi HS. Dental discoloration: An overview. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(6):291-310.
  9. Goldstein RE. In-office bleaching: Where we came from, where we are today. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;128(suppl):11-15.
  10. Zaragoza VMT. Bleaching vital teeth affected by a pathological coloration. Doctoral Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia, School of Medicine; 1983. Thesis.
  11. Zaragoza VMT. Bleaching of vital teeth: Technique. Esto Modeo 1984;9:7-30.
  12. Miara P, Touati B, Haikel Y. La microabrasion amelaire contrulee. Realites Cliniques 1991;2:395-407.
  13. Haywood VB, Heymann HO. Nightguard vital bleaching. Quint Int 1989;20(3):173-176.
  14. Haywood VB, Leech T, Heymann HO, et al. Nightguard vital bleaching: Effects on enamel surface texture and diffusion. Quint Int 1990;21(10):801-804.
  15. Haywood VB, Houck V, Heymann HO. Nightguard vital bleaching: Effects of varying pH solutions on enamel surface texture and color change. Quint Int 1991;22:775-782.
  16. Haywood VB. History, safety, and effectiveness of current bleaching techniques and applications of the nightguard vital bleaching technique. Quint Int 1992;23(7):471-488.
  17. Leonard RH Jr. Efficacy, longevity, side effects, and patient perceptions of nightguard vital bleaching. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19(8):766-774.
  18. Touati B, Miara P, Nathanson D. Dentisterie esthetique et restaurations ceramiques. Editions CDP, 1999;61-116.
  19. Feinman RA, Madray G, Yarborough D. Chemical, optical, and physiologic mechanisms of bleaching products: A review. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1991;3(2):32-36.
  20. Goldstein RE. Esthetics in Dentistry. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, 1976.
  21. Goldstein RE, Garber DA. Complete Dental Bleaching. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1995.
  22. Miara P. Aesthetic treatment of discoloration of nonvital teeth. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1995;7(7):79-84.
  23. Spasser HF. A simple bleaching technique using sodium perborate. NY State Dent J 1961;27:332-334.
  24. Rotstein I, Torek Y, Misgav R. Effects of cementum defects on radicular penetration of 30% H2O2 during intracoronal bleaching. J Endodont 1991;17(5):230-233.
  25. Wainwright WW, Lemoine FA. Rapid diffuse penetration of intact enamel and dentin by carbon-6-14 labeled urea. J Am Dent Assoc 1950;41:135.
  26. Miara P. Une nouvelle technique de blanchiment au fauteuil: La technique compressive. Information Dentaire 2000;82(2):313-319.
  27. Leonard RH Jr, Haywood VB, Phillips C. Risk factors for developing tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation associated with nightguard vital bleaching. Quint Int 1997; 28(8):527-534.
Sorry, your current access level does not permit you to view this page.